I am a big fan of group discussion. Getting your students into small groups can be really helpful for fostering discussion, particularly for those who don't feel comfortable speaking up in front of a large class. At the senior-undergraduate and graduate levels, small group seminars can produce some excellent discussion and exchange of ideas. Group projects, however, are a whole other kettle of fish (yes, I just said that, judge me if you will). It's one thing for students to discuss ideas (or in a lab, collect data together), but having them be evaluated as a group is a recipe for disaster:
via I Love Charts |
The only way for a group project to work is if all the people in the group have similar motivation, goals, and knowledge, which rarely happens in an undergraduate course. There's always that one person who doesn't show up for meetings or does a half-assed job of their part of the project (if they do anything at all). I've had more than my share of group projects where I ended up doing the majority of the work so that we didn't fail. Almost everyone I know has expressed their extreme dislike for group projects.
So the question is, who are the people who think forcing students to do group work is a good idea? This keeps happening in undergraduate classes. Were they the
1 comment:
Agreed. I use group discussion all the time. It's great! I do not utilize group assignments. They are evil.
Post a Comment